Emmental (and not Gruyère

[roseline371274]

The middle schooler already struggles to adjust the straps of his backpack or to know which jeans fit him, so he has to take it easy.
No, because for your information, History is already being glossed over, even biased (another accusation in the debate on reform). Here, let's take a chapter at random: the Second World War. This one has been seen two or three times, if not more, so damn it, it must mean something to you! Okay, so if I tell you the first landing in France, what do you say? 1944? Well no, 1942 was at Dieppe, and there were more losses than at Omaha Beach.


But hey, it was mainly Canadians! Who cares about Canadians, eh? No, seriously: it doesn't fit into the national novel, so hop, it's out, and too bad if we teach something false. And why not say that Quebec exists? Landing again: the largest airborne operation of the war? Oh, damn, they write it in the books, but in fact, no, it's not true either. The largest airborne operation was in 1944, but it was phone number list in Holland, and the Nazis won, which would be fascist to teach. So let's skip ahead! And that was just one chapter, right. Shall we move on to geography? South America? Oh no, that's not on the curriculum. No, it's not very big, and besides, all they do is eat spicy things, it's not interesting. Eastern Europe? Africa? Oceania? Hohoho, come on, let's not dwell on that. We already have the United States to see at least four or five times.

The French curriculum is already a cheese of I can feel the hot breath of my Swiss readers on the back of my neck), so to be indignant at seeing holes in the new proposals is particularly kikinou. But what's more, to invoke the fact that it would attack the teaching of citizenship...

Now we reach the stage of magic; the reform of the school must affect Hogwarts, I suppose.

Because we forget to talk about something. A tiny thing. A detail of the story, I would say (hohoho).