He identified the culprit - even beforehand

[roseline371277]

Not Tell's bullet


The deputy editor-in-chief of SonntagsBlick seems to have already sensed the disaster: In his current editorial, Reza Rafi writes almost apologetically: "The referendum battle over media funding remains an uncomfortable campaign, regardless of the outcome: the campaign by the broadly based supporters was weak. It was worryingly weak." - as Media Minister Sommaruga.

This analysis is probably too simplistic. It was laos rcs data not the supporters' campaign that was "weak", but that of the victorious opponents was simply better and - as the clear result shows - more effective. Nor was it a right-left debate, as the supporters insinuated. The clear result rather indicates a great unease among broad sections of the population towards the media, journalism and, above all, the large publishing houses. The latter was most likely the decisive factor.

The pointed slogan "No tax billions for tax millionaires" was aimed at base instincts of envy, as its supporters rightly criticized, but it also hit a core of truth. The explanation that media companies that boast about their billion-dollar digital strategy, the acquisition of new TV and radio stations or their millions in profits are benefiting from state subsidies and are therefore supposed to be petitioning the state has remained unanswered or at least surprisingly vague in recent weeks. Not even the verbal all-purpose weapon "relevant to democracy" helped against this. Not every rabbit is suitable for the really big magic show.