The media functions according to

[roseline371277]

The German Press Council has solved the problem in its own way: there is no requirement to separate information and commentary. In view of the much-lamented "flood of complaints" to the Press Council - although the figures hardly confirm this in the long term - it might be time to delete paragraph 2.3 from the journalists' code. However, complaints often also allege a violation of guideline 2.3 in a purely subsidiary manner. The above-mentioned case of Nay v. Fontana shows vietnam rcs data that this is a very sensible strategy. If the Press Council simply denies a violation of paragraph 2.3 in difficult cases instead of dealing with more laborious points such as the violation of the duty to tell the truth (paragraph 1 of the journalists' code), it can save a lot of time and effort. However, it does this at the expense of its credibility.

Controversial topics: a different logic than a specialist conference. The Swiss media landscape is also highly competitive. Anyone who wants to be in the media should not shy away from big, controversial topics and should represent crisp positions.

The visual: "Politics is Hollywood for ugly people," people used to joke in the USA. But nowadays, being telegenic and photogenic helps in many media outlets - both for men and women. If you can't boast in this regard, you should still try to offer something visually. That means, for example, being lively and emotional. Or to put it another way: the media like actors, stakeholders and politicians with self-confidence.