The percentage of unique texts was calculated
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2025 5:20 am
Yandex added the “Original Texts” tool to “ Yandex.Webmaster ”. As a regular on several webmaster forums, I have seen many threads there about how important it is to use these tools. Although Yandex honestly wrote: I even came across a study on the effectiveness of this service. More than 15,000 articles sent to the original texts were checked. and the positions were measured - who is higher, the owner of the unique text or the copy-paster site.
With all due respect to the work done in the study, even the graphs above show that qatar email list 14 and 7% of the sites that copied the text bypassed the original source. Later in the article I will explain why this happened. If you repeat something for a long time, it can start to look like the truth. The more they talked about the uniqueness of the content, the more theories arose: For a site to rank highly, the text must be unique.
To get more traffic, the images on the site must be unique. The website design must be unique, websites based on templates do not rank highly. The video must also be unique. Now there will be a small spoiler about the fact that the three statements above are not entirely true. I came across this site when I started studying what non-unique content would “pass” for search engines.
With all due respect to the work done in the study, even the graphs above show that qatar email list 14 and 7% of the sites that copied the text bypassed the original source. Later in the article I will explain why this happened. If you repeat something for a long time, it can start to look like the truth. The more they talked about the uniqueness of the content, the more theories arose: For a site to rank highly, the text must be unique.
To get more traffic, the images on the site must be unique. The website design must be unique, websites based on templates do not rank highly. The video must also be unique. Now there will be a small spoiler about the fact that the three statements above are not entirely true. I came across this site when I started studying what non-unique content would “pass” for search engines.